--- Comment #11 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-19 17:54 ---
*** Bug 39991 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40823
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 16:49 ---
FIXED on the trunk (4.5). Thanks for the draft patch!
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 16:48 ---
Subject: Bug 40823
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Feb 10 16:48:24 2010
New Revision: 156665
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156665
Log:
2010-02-10 Joost VandeVondele
Tobias Burnus
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 09:33 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> this is bold guess at a patch, which does fix the lineno info for this
> testcase, but no idea if this is even remotely correct. Based on the
> observation that gfc_match_function_decl sets
--- Comment #7 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-02-10 09:10 ---
still happens with current trunk. I believe the patch below is still fine.
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #6 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-08-27 16:01 ---
this is bold guess at a patch, which does fix the lineno info for this
testcase, but no idea if this is even remotely correct. Based on the
observation that gfc_match_function_decl sets declared_at, but
gfc_match_subrout
--- Comment #5 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-08-27 15:35 ---
more debug info .. if I declare S1 to be a function instead of a subroutine,
lineno is also correct
anybody with [parse.]c experience willing to take over ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40823
--- Comment #4 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-08-27 06:50 ---
changing component since this really looks like a FE issue
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
