--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-30 17:13 ---
Subject: Bug 40594
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Jun 30 17:13:38 2009
New Revision: 149110
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149110
Log:
2009-06-30 H.J. Lu
Backport from mainline:
2009-0
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-30 17:09 ---
Fixed with r149108. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-30 17:06 ---
Subject: Bug 40594
Author: janus
Date: Tue Jun 30 17:06:27 2009
New Revision: 149108
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149108
Log:
2009-06-30 Janus Weil
PR fortran/40594
* tran
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-30 16:54 ---
Janus, the patch also fixes the original application.
Thanks for looking into it so quickly!
Please submit for review :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40594
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-30 15:06 ---
This patch seems to cure it:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-types.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/trans-types.c (revision 149095)
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-types.c (work
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-30 14:28 ---
Here is a reduced and modified test case. I have marked four lines with a (*),
whose removal results in the correct output (F F), although they seem
completely unrelated. This is pretty strange stuff.
MODULE atom_typ
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-29 17:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=18095)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18095&action=view)
Smallish testcase.
The testcase. Probably not minimal yet, but as close as I can get it now.
Compiled as:
$> r
