http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40568
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40568
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2010-09-28
19:53:01 UTC ---
Close as FIXED (for 4.6).
Separately tracked follow ups:
For simplify of array valued arguments, cf. PR36437.
For updating check_inquiry, cf. PR 45824.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40568
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2010-09-28
19:51:43 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Sep 28 19:51:38 2010
New Revision: 164698
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164698
Log:
gcc/
2010-09-28 Tobias Burnus
PR fortr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40568
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2010-09-28
07:44:13 UTC ---
And expr.c's check_inquiry needs to be updated. I think except for some F95 vs.
newer checks, most items should be handled via flags in add_symbol
(intrinsic.c) as one easily forgets t
