--- Comment #5 from linuxl4 at sohu dot com 2009-04-22 06:44 ---
of cource it is not difficult to reorder the source .
I don't know any compiler can do this, I wish there are a outsmart one.
--
linuxl4 at sohu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from linuxl4 at sohu dot com 2009-04-22 06:37 ---
in my opiton of view ,
at the time a USE statement is processed, the public portions of the specified
module shall be available.
should not been think as about the order of units, since "This standard places
no ordering r
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 05:52 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> no quite.
> but the std post on limitation on this , so I really hope gfortran support it.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/f4ab93c7cece56ee/d4518a39
--- Comment #2 from linuxl4 at sohu dot com 2009-04-22 04:32 ---
no quite.
but the std post on limitation on this , so I really hope gfortran support it.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/f4ab93c7cece56ee/d4518a395a0fd4fe?hl=zh-CN#d4518a395a0fd4fe
to
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Priority|P3 |P5
http:/
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-22 03:35 ---
Are you sure? The module after must be available when
"use after" has been reached. Can you cite the relevant
part of the standard that supports your claim.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39844
