[Bug fortran/39626] Correctly implement details of Fortran 2008 BLOCK construct

2010-02-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-17 21:52 --- See also http://j3-fortran.org/doc/meeting/191/10-126.txt ("Scoping unit fixes for BLOCK construct") -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39626

[Bug fortran/39626] Correctly implement details of Fortran 2008 BLOCK construct

2010-02-10 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 18:26 --- *** Bug 43019 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/39626] Correctly implement details of Fortran 2008 BLOCK construct

2009-09-29 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-29 07:49 --- Also, Tobias mentioned (in the linked thread): The patch looks good to me. It sometimes makes the diagnostics less useful, e.g. for recursive function func(i) integer :: i, func func = 1 entry func2(i) block

[Bug fortran/39626] Correctly implement details of Fortran 2008 BLOCK construct

2009-09-29 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-29 07:48 --- Committed my patch linked above. This implements "basic" BLOCK support (what I as a user would reasonably expect it to behave) but misses a lot of finer details; I'll keep the PR open for those. See my mailing list m