--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-04 21:45 ---
FIXED on the trunk (4.5)
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-04 21:38 ---
Subject: Bug 39577
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Apr 4 21:38:12 2009
New Revision: 145552
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145552
Log:
2009-04-04 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/39577
*
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-30 20:34 ---
I wonder whether a global variable (in trans-decl.c, exported in trans.h) is
not the easiest. There can only be one procedure at a time.
For the existing trans-decl.c one should put a if(!attr.function) as for
functio
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-29 19:20 ---
> the error seems to be due to the second call to test():
> usual suspect = unitialized variable?
No - the problem is a missing "is_recursive = 0" (see dump in comment 0).
The problem is that the variable needs to b
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-03-29 11:21 ---
Confirmed, the error seems to be due to the second call to test(): usual
suspect = unitialized variable?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39577
