--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-28 09:54 ---
Another fix is to #undef TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS as obviously netbsd is another
OS without a clue ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39570
--- Comment #4 from aran at 100acres dot us 2009-03-28 01:34 ---
Subject: Re: cabs and cabsf are named differently on NetBSD 5
What is beyond me is how darwin_patch_builtings gets called.
It looks like it is called from rs6000.c in
rs6000_init_builtins via the macro SUBTARGET_INIT_B
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-28 01:02 ---
Completely beyond you, how?
What gcc does for darwin (and this is a hack, mind you), is basically replace
the standard C99 builtins with darwin-specific ones. You have to do the same
for NetBSD.
See the following f
--- Comment #2 from aran at 100acres dot us 2009-03-28 00:23 ---
I really tried looking at Darwin's fix to the built-in problem, but that is
completely beyond me. Any suggestions would be very nice.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39570
--- Comment #1 from aran at 100acres dot us 2009-03-28 00:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=17552)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17552&action=view)
Grungy little patch.
This is a dirty hack for NetBSD 5.x only. It is not intended to be applied to
the main source.
