--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-06 08:36 ---
Committed as r145583. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-06 08:33 ---
Subject: Bug 39414
Author: janus
Date: Mon Apr 6 08:33:31 2009
New Revision: 145583
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145583
Log:
2009-04-06 Janus Weil
PR fortran/39414
* decl.c
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-11 16:19 ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-03/msg00028.html
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-09 22:00 ---
> procedure() :: p
> integer :: p
I think it is valid; ifort 11beta also accepts it. (NAG 5.1 doesn't.)
Looking at "12.3.2.3 Procedure declaration statement" one sees that
"PROCEDURE()" is has the same effect as the
