--- Comment #7 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-02-13 04:53 ---
> So, can we close this PR as fixed?
I thought it was marked as fixed long time back (2009-01-15) by Joost. Anyway,
the answer is yes.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38853
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-13 03:39 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> For those reading the archives, this problem is specific to Solaris 8. The
> backtrace from this ICE (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-01/msg00321.html)
> is similar to another problem I en
--- Comment #5 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-02-12 23:59 ---
For those reading the archives, this problem is specific to Solaris 8. The
backtrace from this ICE (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-01/msg00321.html)
is similar to another problem I encountered with a C program as well
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-15 06:54 ---
First, the code compiles fine on i386 with 4.4.0 20090113.
Second, I support Joost's position in that the ICE you
posted and the subsequent failure of loading f951 in dbx
suggests the problem is in your installation.
--- Comment #3 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-15 06:21 ---
Joost,
Did you test on the solaris machine or on the i386 machine. I think this is a
architecture specific bug. Could you please confirm the architecture of your
machine?
thanks
raju
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-01-15 06:05 ---
doesn't fail in 4.4.0 and 4.3.1.
Since this refers to an 'old' version of trunk (i.e. 4.4. in full development),
I'll close this as fixed. If the problem remains with an up-to-date trunk, or
on any active release branch
--- Comment #1 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-14 22:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=17105)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17105&action=view)
code to reproduce the internal compiler error
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38853
