[Bug fortran/38726] gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64

2009-01-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-01-05 14:14 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Please can someone test on older revisions/provide more information? The test passes with gfortran 4.2.3, but not 4.3.2 on powerpc-apple-darwin9. Hence it is a regression. -- http://gc

[Bug fortran/38726] gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64

2009-01-05 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-05 13:58 --- (In reply to comment #0) > On Linux/ia64, revision 143058 gave > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 -O0 execution test > According to the gcc-testresults mailing list, this is confirmed on powerpc-ibm

[Bug fortran/38726] gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64

2009-01-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-01-05 13:57 --- See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-01/msg00421.html for powerpc-apple-darwin8.5.0. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38726

[Bug fortran/38726] gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_7.f90 fail on Linux/ia64

2009-01-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-01-05 13:54 --- The executable aborts on powerpc-apple-darwin9 (r143074) when compiled with -m32, but passes when compiled with -m64. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38726