--- Comment #12 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-18 22:28
---
(In reply to comment #11)
> As commented multiple times in PR34640, given the similarity of the testcase,
> the identical backtrace and the same assignee ...
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 34640
--- Comment #11 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-18 22:26
---
As commented multiple times in PR34640, given the similarity of the testcase,
the identical backtrace and the same assignee ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38471
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 11:19
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released. Deferring to 4.5.1.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 17:33 ---
I never accepted this to be a regression and now, when it is the only one, I
feel that it is time to register that :-) It will, of course, be dealt with
once I attack the array descriptor business. ice-on-invalid-cod
