https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38351
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38351
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Jun 9 21:54:45 2018
New Revision: 261376
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261376&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-09 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/38351
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38351
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38351
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Jun 9 17:38:24 2018
New Revision: 261365
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261365&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-09 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/38351
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38351
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Jun 9 15:58:24 2018
New Revision: 261363
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261363&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-09 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/38351
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38351
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Index: resolve.c
===
--- resolve.c (revision 236243)
+++ resolve.c (working copy)
@@ -3586,7 +3586,13 @@ resolve_operator (gfc_exp
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-01 16:48 ---
The best message other compilers had are:
a) NAG f95:
Error: fgjf.f90, line 15: No specific match for reference to operator +
Error: fgjf.f90, line 15: Incompatible data types for the + operator
