--- Comment #21 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-08 14:11 ---
Fixed in trunk and 4.4. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #20 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-08 14:03 ---
Subject: Bug 38152
Author: janus
Date: Wed Apr 8 14:03:33 2009
New Revision: 145735
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145735
Log:
2009-04-08 Janus Weil
PR fortran/38152
* tra
--- Comment #19 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 16:24 ---
Subject: Bug 38152
Author: janus
Date: Tue Apr 7 16:24:31 2009
New Revision: 145692
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145692
Log:
2009-04-07 Janus Weil
PR fortran/38152
* tra
--- Comment #18 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 12:41 ---
Patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c(Revision 145652)
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1015,10
--- Comment #17 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 12:11 ---
All !DECL_IGNORED_P VAR_DECLs should have DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION set to something
other than UNKNOWN_LOCATION. So, either the FE forgot to set it, or it didn't
set DECL_IGNORED_P flag when it should.
--
http://gcc
--- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 11:43 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> proc_decl_13.f90 produces a segfault when compiled with "-g".
Sorry. Of course I'm talking about proc_ptr_13.f90.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38152
--- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-07 11:40 ---
Reopening.
proc_decl_13.f90 produces a segfault when compiled with "-g".
Backtrace:
#0 0x00f4bee1 in htab_hash_string (p=0x0) at
/home/jweil/gcc45/trunk/libiberty/hashtab.c:812
#1 0x005ff979 in lo
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
Version|unknown |4.4.0
http://
--- Comment #14 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-25 07:47 ---
*** Bug 38831 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38152
--- Comment #13 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-17 13:25 ---
Close as FIXED based on Dominique's remark.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #12 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-01-17 13:20 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> This PR can be closed, provided there are no remaining issues on darwin9 (see
> comment #4 and #5). I cannot check this myself (since I don't have access to a
> darwin system), but maybe D
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-16 12:30 ---
This PR can be closed, provided there are no remaining issues on darwin9 (see
comment #4 and #5). I cannot check this myself (since I don't have access to a
darwin system), but maybe Dominique can?
--
janus at gcc
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-16 12:04 ---
Subject: Bug 38152
Author: janus
Date: Fri Jan 16 12:03:51 2009
New Revision: 143430
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143430
Log:
2009-01-16 Janus Weil
PR fortran/38152
* exp
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-16 06:50 ---
> Can we still get this into 4.4? In a way the ICE is a regression, since 4.3
> just gave an error message (stating that procedure pointers are not
> implemented) but no ICE.
I think one could; the patch only affects
14 matches
Mail list logo
