[Bug fortran/37974] gfortran runtime segmentation fault

2020-06-11 Thread ma...@linux-mips.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37974 Maciej W. Rozycki changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE CC|

[Bug fortran/37974] gfortran runtime segmentation fault

2008-10-30 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-31 03:39 --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > call seg_sub(ip, sig, 1) > > > > Is that last argument a literal constant, name 'one'? > > Or is it the letter 'ell'? > > > It is a literal constant 'on

[Bug fortran/37974] gfortran runtime segmentation fault

2008-10-30 Thread deji_aking at yahoo dot ca
--- Comment #2 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2008-10-31 03:31 --- (In reply to comment #1) > call seg_sub(ip, sig, 1) > > Is that last argument a literal constant, name 'one'? > Or is it the letter 'ell'? > It is a literal constant 'one'. What really bugs me is why does it se

[Bug fortran/37974] gfortran runtime segmentation fault

2008-10-30 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-31 02:19 --- call seg_sub(ip, sig, 1) Is that last argument a literal constant, name 'one'? Or is it the letter 'ell'? Either way it is impossible to reliable detect that a user writes code that either tries to change the