[Bug fortran/37355] Request runtime preconnected buffer option for gfortran

2015-08-30 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37355 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/37355] Request runtime preconnected buffer option for gfortran

2015-08-30 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37355 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/37355] Request runtime preconnected buffer option for gfortran

2015-08-26 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37355 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug fortran/37355] Request runtime preconnected buffer option for gfortran

2014-03-22 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37355 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #6 from Dominique

[Bug fortran/37355] Request runtime preconnected buffer option for gfortran

2010-04-12 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-13 05:40 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Looking at latest gfortran, we have raw_init and buf_init functions which set > the style of I/O. I think it would be relatively easy now to create a Gnu > extension as an intrinsic procedu

[Bug fortran/37355] Request runtime preconnected buffer option for gfortran

2010-04-12 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-13 04:10 --- Looking at latest gfortran, we have raw_init and buf_init functions which set the style of I/O. I think it would be relatively easy now to create a Gnu extension as an intrinsic procedure call that will force a f

[Bug fortran/37355] Request runtime preconnected buffer option for gfortran

2008-09-11 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-11 19:30 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Yes, FLUSH works, but > > * I don't think it was part of standards until 2003, > * I need to place it several places in my code, > * I really didn't want gfortran specific code if I coul

[Bug fortran/37355] Request runtime preconnected buffer option for gfortran

2008-09-08 Thread MMcVeigh at att dot net
--- Comment #2 from MMcVeigh at att dot net 2008-09-08 20:00 --- Yes, FLUSH works, but * I don't think it was part of standards until 2003, * I need to place it several places in my code, * I really didn't want gfortran specific code if I could avoid it * There isn't a problem with bu

[Bug fortran/37355] Request runtime preconnected buffer option for gfortran

2008-09-08 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-08 18:29 --- (In reply to comment #0) I would like a method to override > the default buffering at runtime. What about calling FLUSH in critical places? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37355

[Bug fortran/37355] Request runtime preconnected buffer option for gfortran

2008-09-03 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Priority|P3 |P5 http:/