--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-23 07:27 ---
Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-22 21:28 ---
Subject: Bug 37254
Author: janus
Date: Mon Jun 22 21:28:34 2009
New Revision: 148817
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148817
Log:
2009-06-22 Janus Weil
PR fortran/37254
* gf
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-22 21:08 ---
r148816 fixes comment #1 and #3.
The errors in comment #4 are justified, since subroutines and functions are
mixed.
So I think this can be closed if there are no further problems.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-22 21:02 ---
Subject: Bug 37254
Author: janus
Date: Mon Jun 22 21:02:19 2009
New Revision: 148816
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148816
Log:
2009-06-22 Janus Weil
PR fortran/37254
PR for
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 17:42 ---
Regarding the validity see also
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/5d2154a34072eb72/d9d7f1edde9aaa5b
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37254
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 12:28 ---
I'm not sure the codes in comment #1 and #3 are actually valid, or if gfortran
is right to reject them. See also PR33162 comment #9, where Jerry concludes
that a similar thing should be rejected (this is proc_decl_8.f9
--- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-08-28 13:05 ---
Grepping the sources it seems that the value of ??->intent associated with 'p'
is not reset to INTENT_UNKNOWN on "p => new_proc".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37254
--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-08-28 09:33 ---
It seems that some "attribute(s)" is(are) not properly (re)set. The following
code
module myMod
CONTAINS
subroutine proc1(arg1, arg2, arg3)
integer :: arg1, arg2, arg3
print*, arg1, arg2, arg3, 's ',
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-27 19:52 ---
Also the following version of Dominique's test case gives the same error, using
PROCEDURE statements without the POINTER attribute:
real function proc3( arg1 )
integer :: arg1
proc3 = arg1+7
end function
