[Bug fortran/37224] Request for C string literal syntax

2008-12-09 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 22:26 --- Given comments #1 and #2, this is a WONTFIX. Closing. Please reopen if this should be further discussed. -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/37224] Request for C string literal syntax

2008-08-24 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-24 20:26 --- > FYI: I also suggested that they look into gfortran's work on implementing new > character kinds such as UTF-8. That part is defined in the Fortran 2003 standard (optional) and the almost-ISO-approved Fortran 2008 (

[Bug fortran/37224] Request for C string literal syntax

2008-08-24 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-24 19:45 --- gfortran does have -fbackslash that enables c-style interpretation of backslash characters in strings. With the Intel approach, the code will not compile without error by a standard conforming compiler. I would