--- Comment #7 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-29 09:17 ---
Fixed.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-29 09:12 ---
Subject: Bug 36403
Author: domob
Date: Tue Jul 29 09:11:51 2008
New Revision: 138234
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138234
Log:
2008-07-29 Daniel Kraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 20:04 ---
> and it seems as though PACK and RESHAPE would suffer from the same problem as
> EOSHIFT does
Seems so. I glanced through F2008 CD but I could not find more potential
problems.
> Is it ok if I try to write one gene
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 18:41 ---
Thanks for all the hints, Tobias! I've had a look through the F2003 standard
about intrinsics taking optional char arguments, and it seems as though PACK
and RESHAPE would suffer from the same problem as EOSHIFT does
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-27 13:52 ---
> Isn't this maybe a general problem about optional string arguments?
> Or is this really a eoshift-specific problem? I'm just thinking about a
> general solution for this kind of problem if it isn't.
I think this m
--- Comment #2 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-24 17:03 ---
Isn't this maybe a general problem about optional string arguments? Or is this
really a eoshift-specific problem? I'm just thinking about a general solution
for this kind of problem if it isn't; in that case it would
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36403
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36403
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-02 11:29
---
It's a front-end issue: as the BOUNDARY character argument is not present, its
length is not appended to the argument list as it should. I guess we need to
add a gfc_conv_intrinsic_eoshift function in trans-intrin
11 matches
Mail list logo
