[Bug fortran/36379] preprocessing preprocessed output: invalid reads

2008-06-09 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-06-09 20:00 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 36479 *** -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/36379] preprocessing preprocessed output: invalid reads

2008-06-07 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-07 16:51 --- This should help: + cpp_option->char_precision = TYPE_PRECISION (char_type_node); However, now I'm stuck with an ordering problem ... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36379

[Bug fortran/36379] preprocessing preprocessed output: invalid reads

2008-06-07 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-07 16:06 --- Some progress: libcpp, charset.c (emit_numeric_escape): here cvt.width != CPP_OPTION (pfile, char_precision) [0 != 8] If the logic of the check is inverted, everything works as expected. This indicates that some

[Bug fortran/36379] preprocessing preprocessed output: invalid reads

2008-06-07 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-07 12:56 --- Traced this down to libcpp, charset.c(cpp_interpret_string). There, the 'to' string is not properly NUL-terminated, although the comments indicate that this is the intention of the code. Example: $> cat x.f90 # 1 "y

[Bug fortran/36379] preprocessing preprocessed output: invalid reads

2008-05-29 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-29 22:18 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Duplicate of PR 36276 ? Doesn't have the same location, so I don't think so :) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36379

[Bug fortran/36379] preprocessing preprocessed output: invalid reads

2008-05-29 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-29 21:00 --- Duplicate of PR 36276 ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36379