--- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-28 21:37 ---
Fixed with r136130. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-28 21:28 ---
Subject: Bug 36325
Author: janus
Date: Wed May 28 21:27:56 2008
New Revision: 136130
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=136130
Log:
2008-05-28 Janus Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-25 22:33 ---
The failure of proc_decl_9.f90 was actually due to a bug that slipped in with
my procedure declaration update patch from May 1st, which I have fixed now.
So we're left with gomp/reduction3.f90, which contains this pie
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-25 19:58 ---
> Patch is attached.
You need also to reject the following, which violates R504.
interface
real function bar()
end function bar
end interface
dimension :: bar(4)
end
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-25 19:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=15684)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15684&action=view)
patch
Ok, I extended the patch, and got the regression count down from a few million
to exactly two:
FAIL: gfort
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-25 17:11 ---
> Which leads me to think we should probably implement this (for the case that
> the interface is explicit). Or is there any good reason that this is not done?
Well, regarding the reason: Before interfaces had no EXT
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-25 16:37 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Others testcases (like argument_checking_3.f90) fail because they define lots
> of specific interfaces, but no external implementation for those.
Obviously I got this wrong. The actual reaso
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-25 15:36 ---
> Ok, this produces an impressive list of regressions.
> Many of those (e.g. actual_procedure_1.f90) seem to be related to
> conf (external, dimension); /* See Fortran 95's R504. */
> I'm not sure if the constrai
--- Comment #2 from jaydub66 at gmail dot com 2008-05-25 14:45 ---
Ok, this produces an impressive list of regressions.
Many of those (e.g. actual_procedure_1.f90) seem to be related to
conf (external, dimension); /* See Fortran 95's R504. */
I'm not sure if the constraint from R
--- Comment #1 from jaydub66 at gmail dot com 2008-05-25 14:02 ---
Here is a first patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/symbol.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/symbol.c(revision 135859)
+++ gcc/fortran/symbol.c(working copy)
@@ -
10 matches
Mail list logo
