--- Comment #5 from billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 08:17
---
Fixed by testsuite patch. See PR 38955, which is a duplicate of this PR.
--
billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-28 18:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=16790)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16790&action=view)
Mikael's dump (2008-11-28)
Can't compare with Jerry's dump (looks like it's outdated now).
--
http://gcc.g
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 12:57
---
Confirmed on recent trunk.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-21 00:30
---
Created an attachment (id=15659)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15659&action=view)
-O3 -fdump-tree-all
Here is the dump in tar ball.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36205
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-20 15:14
---
Jerry, could you recompile it with -fdump-tree-all and attach all the tree
dumps? Then we can do the same on x86_64-linux and see if it's something in the
code generation, or later.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
