--- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-05-02 10:08 ---
> Could those for whose it fails try to find out which of the various LC_*
> options fails?
>
> For instance: LC_ALL=C LC_NUMERIC=zh_CN.UTF-8 or LC_CTYPE="zh_CN.UTF-8" or
> ...
Although I did not exhaust all the co
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-02 09:48 ---
Works for me for 4.4.0 20080424 on a X86-64 openSUSE Factory (approx. oS
11.0beta2) with a glibc 2.8 (20080410).
I wonder whether it has something to do with the recent sign/decimal comma
work.
Could those for whose
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-05-01 21:48 ---
Confirmed on *-apple-darwin9 with "setenv LC_ALL zh_CN.UTF-8". The error does
not show up with
LANG=fr
LC_ALL=C
LC_COLLATE=POSIX
or if I unset LC_ALL. It is a regression on 4.4, it works on 4.3.
--
http://gcc.
--- Comment #6 from linuxl4 at sohu dot com 2008-05-01 21:43 ---
If I export LC_ALL=POSIX
then gfortran 4.4 works.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36103
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-01 20:53 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> This information should have been in the intial bug report!
> What happens if you don't set LC_ALL?
And if that works, then bug is that the translation needs to be changed but we
don't han
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-01 20:50 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> gfortran 4.4 failed to make a.out file, try this ::
>
> export LC_ALL=zh_CN.UTF-8
> gfortran cputime.f90
>
> then:
>
> f951: ±àÒëÆ÷ÄÚ²¿´íÎó£ºÔÚ error_print ÖУ¬
--- Comment #3 from linuxl4 at sohu dot com 2008-05-01 20:25 ---
gfortran 4.4 failed to make a.out file, try this ::
export LC_ALL=zh_CN.UTF-8
gfortran cputime.f90
then:
f951: ±àÒëÆ÷ÄÚ²¿´íÎó£ºÔÚ error_print ÖУ¬ÓÚ fortran/error.c:497
ÇëÌá½»Ò»·ÝÍêÕûµÄ´íÎ󱨸
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-01 19:36 ---
> call cpu_time(end)
> print '(f6.3)',end-start
>
> gfortran 430 and 423 are ok.
> gfortran 4.4.0 failed.
If I understand it correctly, the problem is that gfortran 4.4.0 is much slower
than
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-01 19:00 ---
What do you mean by 'failed', which is a fairly generic word?
Show that actually error message!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36103
