--- Comment #10 from michael dot baudin at gmail dot com 2008-04-24 19:55
---
Subject: Re: Recursive function with allocatable array
Thank you for fixing the bug.
Michaël
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 12:32 AM, pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-19 22:32 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.3.
Thanks for the report.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-19 22:31 ---
Subject: Bug 35959
Author: pault
Date: Sat Apr 19 22:30:03 2008
New Revision: 134475
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134475
Log:
2008-04-19 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-19 21:56 ---
Subject: Bug 35959
Author: pault
Date: Sat Apr 19 21:55:24 2008
New Revision: 134472
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134472
Log:
2008-04-19 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #6 from michael dot baudin at gmail dot com 2008-04-18 15:07
---
Subject: Re: Recursive function with allocatable array
I used the -fdump-tree-original option to compare the version produced on this
source code with allocatable and pointer.
Only the allocatable contains th
--- Comment #5 from michael dot baudin at gmail dot com 2008-04-18 14:11
---
Subject: Re: Recursive function with allocatable array
Thank you very much.
I will try immediately.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 4:04 PM, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Com
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-18 14:04
---
Reply to: But I wonder how you produced this source (which have many in common
with C),
The intermediate code can be listed using the -fdump-tree-original compiler
flag. It will be placed in a file with the word
--- Comment #3 from michael dot baudin at gmail dot com 2008-04-18 08:13
---
Subject: Re: Recursive function with allocatable array
Hi Paul,
The generic source code that you sent to me is interesting
and you analysis is very clear. Thank you for taking the time
to fix this.
But I wo
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-17 20:37 ---
This is indeed a bug. A fix will be posted in half an hour or so.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-17 05:59 ---
Here is a further reduced version of the testcase:
program testprog
type :: t_type
integer, dimension(:), allocatable :: chars
end type t_type
integer, save :: callnb = 0
type(t_type) :: this
allocate (
10 matches
Mail list logo
