--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-26 22:41 ---
FIXED on the trunk (4.4.0).
The not-so-helpful error message is now PR 35267.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-26 22:34 ---
Subject: Bug 35033
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Feb 26 22:33:35 2008
New Revision: 132689
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132689
Log:
2008-02-26 Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fort
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-30 22:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=15059)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15059&action=view)
Patch - build & regtested (x86-64-linux)
Patch fixes actual problem and includes a test case. Missing is only im
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-30 18:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=15057)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15057&action=view)
Draft Patch
First patch:
- Better error message
- Fix that check
But ...
The volatile constrain is properly tak
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-30 17:22 ---
"Error: Assignment operator interface at (1) must not redefine an INTRINSIC
type
assignment"
The error message by itself is correct - but
a) The position is very bad it should point to SUBROUTINE and not to END
SUBRO
