--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-30 07:02 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-30 06:56 ---
Subject: Bug 34975
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jan 30 06:56:10 2008
New Revision: 131956
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131956
Log:
2008-01-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-01-28 12:25 ---
My tests have not been as exhaustive as the Tobias' ones, but the patch worked
as advertised without regression on ppc/intel Darwin9, 32 and 64 bit modes.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34975
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-28 11:09 ---
> Created an attachment (id=15033)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15033&action=view) [edit]
> A patch for this regression
> I have just put this on to bootstrap and regtest whilst I sleep. Since
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-27 22:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=15033)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15033&action=view)
A patch for this regression
I have just put this on to bootstrap and regtest whilst I sleep. Since it
changes no
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-27 10:34 ---
I note that the pigeon carrying my reply to #3 got lost; my subsequent message
must therefore be a bit mysterious.
Changing the name of the symtree of an unwanted symbol from 'foo' to
'hidden.foo' is completely screwi
--- Comment #5 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2008-01-27 07:09 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Bogus error with USEing
modules
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-27 00:14
> ---
>
>> If the ONLY's i test.f
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-27 00:14 ---
> If the ONLY's i test.f90 are removed, it builds fine
Actually, also removing a single dummy argument (e.g. "df") and it builds fine.
I think somewhere the tree might be walked wrongly. The question is only where.
L
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-26 13:25 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created an attachment (id=15024)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15024&action=view) [edit]
> Test files (tar.gz). Use "make"
Uggghhh!
If the ONLY's i test.f90 are remove
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-25 20:21 ---
Paul, do you have an idea? The attached program fails rather strangely. I try
to reduce it further, but currently the error disappears as soon as I touch
something.
Works: 2007-11-23-r130365
Fails: 2007-11-26-r130431
10 matches
Mail list logo
