--- Comment #11 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-28 15:44
---
Fixed on mainline.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-28 15:43
---
Subject: Bug 34868
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Thu Feb 28 15:42:21 2008
New Revision: 132751
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132751
Log:
PR fortran/34868
* trans-expr.c (gfc_c
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-28 10:42
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> There's more to it... using the "result" syntax for the function makes it fail
> even with my patch
That's because the result symbol is not marked with attr.always_explicit, only
the pr
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-27 14:51
---
There's more to it... using the "result" syntax for the function makes it fail
even with my patch:
function f(a) result(res)
implicit none
real(8), intent(in) :: a(:)
complex(8) :: res
res = cmplx(sum(a)
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-27 10:35
---
Actually, after looking more in depth at the front-end code, we do a fairly
good job of supporting the use of f2c calling conventions for Fortran 95 code
(it's mainly handled by the use of sym->attr.always_explici
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-31 15:36
---
That one is not a regression. It happens because, when the a argument is an
assumed-shape array, gfc_return_by_reference() return 0 because
sym->attr.always_explicit is set for the function.
There are two interes
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-21 07:41 ---
> Then the resultant C source is
>VOID f_(doublecomplex * ret_val, doublereal *a)
Indeed this is f2c (and g77 -ff2c) syntax.
> So it seems to me that the current functionality of the gfortran is different
> from
--- Comment #4 from yamagen at coral dot t dot u-tokyo dot ac dot jp
2008-01-21 02:57 ---
Thank you very much for your comments.
First I answer to you why I would like to use -ff2c option.
The reason is that I would like to use "-framework vecLib".
In the URL
http://developer.apple
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-19 12:43 ---
Without -ff2c, gfortran uses (-fdump-tree-original):
complex(kind=8) __result_f;
__result_f = __complex__ (0.0, 0.0);
but for -ff2c it looks odd:
f (a)
{
complex(kind=8) __result_f;
*__result_f = 0.0;
ret
