--- Comment #6 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-08-12 18:27
---
Subject: Re: defined assignment not allowed to vector subscripted array
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 3:39 PM, jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #5 from jv244 at cam dot a
--- Comment #5 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-08-08 20:39 ---
has J3 judged the testcase ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34805
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-31 19:22 ---
> "If the actual argument is an array section having a vector subscript, the
> dummy argument is not definable and shall not have the INTENT (OUT), INTENT
> (INOUT), VOLATILE, or ASYNCHRONOUS attributes."
>
> gfortr
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #3 from dick dot hendrickson at gmail dot com 2008-01-16 20:07
---
Subject: Re: defined assignment not allowed to vector subscripted array
Why not put this one on hold for a while. I'll check some more.
There never was a
formal interpretation request. It's kind of odd, b
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 16:34 ---
Found the relevant part in the Fortran standard:
Fortran 2003: "12.4.1.2 Actual arguments associated with dummy data objects"
"If the actual argument is an array section having a vector subscript, the
dummy argument
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 07:23 ---
The error message is strange, but an error is not necessarily wrong. Other
compilers show the following messages:
NAG f95 shows the error:
Error: line 29: Argument T (no. 1) of C_U_TO_T is OUT or INOUT but is not a
