--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-13 22:10 ---
> It turns out this is not a gfortran bug. My apologies for any time wasted.
Closing then as invalid. Thanks for re-checking.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #6 from damian at rouson dot net 2008-01-13 17:59 ---
It turns out this is not a gfortran bug. My apologies for any time wasted.
--
damian at rouson dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #5 from damian at rouson dot net 2008-01-13 16:40 ---
I was trying to demonstrate multiple instances of the bug. Based on comment
#4, I realize that the compiler performed correctly in at least 3 of the 4
instances. I will now attempt to verify whether the 4th instance is ac
--
damian at rouson dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34765
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-13 10:34 ---
I modified now FUNCTION fluid_Statistics to read as follows:
205print *, 'BEFORE'
206v1 = velocity(1)
207PRINT *,'AFTER gfortran_bug: the line above this should indicate
the terminati
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-13 10:26 ---
It would be great, if you could create a minimal example; I still do not fully
understand what is not working. I get the same output using gfortran, the Intel
Fortran Compiler 10.1 and g95.
Or at least give an exampl
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-13 04:59 ---
Does NR/ contain Numerical Recipes code? If so, you've just
posted copyrighted code to public database.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34765
--- Comment #1 from damian at rouson dot net 2008-01-13 01:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=14933)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14933&action=view)
Please see the README file in the attached bzipped archive & search the file
disperse.out for the text "gfortran_bug".
