--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-05 17:03
---
Fixed on trunk.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
St
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-05 16:12
---
Subject: Bug 34676
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jan 5 16:12:00 2008
New Revision: 131338
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131338
Log:
2008-01-05 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-05 16:01
---
Subject: Bug 34676
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jan 5 16:00:40 2008
New Revision: 131337
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131337
Log:
2008-01-05 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-05 05:15
---
A patch has been submitted for approval:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-01/msg00034.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34676
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-05 00:03
---
Yes I do have an idea. I was afraid when we accommodated the previous PR we
would generate another. :) I will see what I can do.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-04 16:03 ---
The change occurred between 2007-09-27-r128828 and 2007-10-08-r129121.
Educated guess: PR 33400; and indeed, reverting the patch gives the old
behaviour. The trick is now have the old behaviour for this code without
