[Bug fortran/34324] Module files on CRLF systems

2007-12-14 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-14 10:27 --- Fixed in trunk (r130928). Closing. -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/34324] Module files on CRLF systems

2007-12-14 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-14 10:25 --- Subject: Bug 34324 Author: dfranke Date: Fri Dec 14 10:25:12 2007 New Revision: 130928 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130928 Log: 2007-12-14 Daniel Franke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fo

[Bug fortran/34324] Module files on CRLF systems

2007-12-13 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-13 20:45 --- > Why does this need fixing? Someone noticed. Hence, someone checked. As the patch is not exactly intrusive, I think it's worth the change. On windows it suffices to open and close a file in the "wrong" editor to r

[Bug fortran/34324] Module files on CRLF systems

2007-12-13 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-13 20:29 --- Why does this need fixing? If people edit .mod files manually, failure is what they deserve. Does the proposed patch even work with more complex modules (due to the checksum)? >From module.c: fputs ("000

[Bug fortran/34324] Module files on CRLF systems

2007-12-13 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-13 19:16 --- Confirmed. Regtesting patch. -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added