[Bug fortran/33945] PROCEDURE in module somtimes wrongly rejected

2007-11-19 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-11-20 05:05 --- Subject: Bug number PR33945 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg00416.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug fortran/33945] PROCEDURE in module somtimes wrongly rejected

2007-11-10 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-11-10 17:26 --- Subject: Bug number PR33945 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg00416.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug fortran/33945] PROCEDURE in module somtimes wrongly rejected

2007-11-09 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #6 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-11-10 03:54 --- Subject: Bug number PR33945 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg00416.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug fortran/33945] PROCEDURE in module somtimes wrongly rejected

2007-11-08 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-08 15:39 --- The check-in was the following (note the wrong bug number). Author: burnus Date: Thu Nov 8 15:28:30 2007 New Revision: 130002 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130002 Log: 2007-11-08 Tobias Bur

[Bug fortran/33945] PROCEDURE in module somtimes wrongly rejected

2007-11-08 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-08 15:29 --- Both problems fixed on the trunk (4.3.0). Other branches are not affected as PROCEDURE is new. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/33945] PROCEDURE in module somtimes wrongly rejected

2007-11-02 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last recon

[Bug fortran/33945] PROCEDURE in module somtimes wrongly rejected

2007-11-02 Thread jvdelisle at verizon dot net
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at verizon dot net 2007-11-02 13:29 --- Subject: Re: PROCEDURE in module somtimes wrongly rejected burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-02 07:40 > --- > Note: MODULE PROCEDURE and PROCED

[Bug fortran/33945] PROCEDURE in module somtimes wrongly rejected

2007-11-01 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-02 07:40 --- (In reply to comment #1) > The statement: >procedure x > is an F2003 feature allowing the word 'module' preceding as optional. Note: MODULE PROCEDURE and PROCEDURE mean different things. "MODULE PROCEDURE" can

[Bug fortran/33945] PROCEDURE in module somtimes wrongly rejected

2007-11-01 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-02 06:35 --- The statement: procedure x is an F2003 feature allowing the word 'module' preceding as optional. If I use 'module procedure x' the test case compiles OK for me. I think I may have fixed this with my pr3316