--- Comment #16 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-31 09:59 ---
FIXED on the trunk (= 4.3.0).
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-31 09:59 ---
Subject: Bug 33897
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Oct 31 09:59:16 2007
New Revision: 129795
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129795
Log:
2007-10-31 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortr
--- Comment #14 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-10-30 22:15 ---
Subject: Bug number PR33897
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg01694.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #13 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-10-30 03:47 ---
Subject: Bug number PR33897
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg01694.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #12 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2007-10-27 15:47 ---
Subject: Re: Incorrect host association in module
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-27 13:31
> ---
> To recap (correct me, if I'm wrong):
>
--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-27 13:31 ---
To recap (correct me, if I'm wrong):
The program in comment 0 (original bug description) is valid Fortran, but the
"setbd" is an external function which needs to be provided at link time. It is
not the module functi
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-27 07:07 ---
The logic is all wrong in parse.c(gfc_fixup_sibling_symbols). I can fix this
bug but I need to regtest and to check for other such cases in the standard.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
