--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-10-30 03:45 ---
Subject: Bug number PR33862
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg01617.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-10-30 03:45 ---
Subject: Bug number PR33862
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg01617.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-27 14:46 ---
FIXED on the trunk (GCC 4.3.0).
As suggested, .FTN (and now .FOR) use the preprocessor.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-27 14:44 ---
Subject: Bug 33862
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Oct 27 14:43:53 2007
New Revision: 129680
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129680
Log:
2007-10-27 Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fort
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-24 10:00
---
(In reply to comment #0)
> +{".ftn", "@f77", 0, 0, 0},
> +{".FTN", "@f77", 0, 0, 0},
Question is: do both case variants actually exist, and does the uppercase one
requires preprocessing?
--
fxcoudert at gcc d
