[Bug fortran/33749] Wrong evaluation of expressions in lhs of assignment statements

2007-10-30 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-30 22:20 --- (In reply to comment #8) > Subject: Bug number PR33749 > > A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. > The mailing list url for the patch is > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg01237.ht

[Bug fortran/33749] Wrong evaluation of expressions in lhs of assignment statements

2007-10-30 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-10-30 22:15 --- Subject: Bug number PR33749 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg01237.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug fortran/33749] Wrong evaluation of expressions in lhs of assignment statements

2007-10-23 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-23 08:20 --- (In reply to comment #6) > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129539 > Log: > 2007-10-21 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > PR fortran/33749 Paul, can this bug be closed as FIXED or is

[Bug fortran/33749] Wrong evaluation of expressions in lhs of assignment statements

2007-10-21 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-21 18:10 --- Subject: Bug 33749 Author: pault Date: Sun Oct 21 18:10:00 2007 New Revision: 129539 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129539 Log: 2007-10-21 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/33749] Wrong evaluation of expressions in lhs of assignment statements

2007-10-17 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-18 04:26 --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > You're right. The assignment even produces the temporary for the lhs index > > that it should. Now why on earth does this happen in 64bit mode an not in > > 32b

[Bug fortran/33749] Wrong evaluation of expressions in lhs of assignment statements

2007-10-17 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-17 12:36 --- (In reply to comment #3) > You're right. The assignment even produces the temporary for the lhs index > that it should. Now why on earth does this happen in 64bit mode an not in > 32bit?? Sometimes, the differe

[Bug fortran/33749] Wrong evaluation of expressions in lhs of assignment statements

2007-10-12 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-12 19:09 --- (In reply to comment #2) > The same on PPC Darwin: pr33749 with -m64 gives the expected result, but > pr33686 gives the same result for 32 and 64 bit modes. > Tobias and Dominique, You're right. The assignment even

[Bug fortran/33749] Wrong evaluation of expressions in lhs of assignment statements

2007-10-12 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-10-12 15:23 --- The same on PPC Darwin: pr33749 with -m64 gives the expected result, but pr33686 gives the same result for 32 and 64 bit modes. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33749

[Bug fortran/33749] Wrong evaluation of expressions in lhs of assignment statements

2007-10-12 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-12 15:18 --- I want to add that I cannot reproduce it on x86-64/Linux with -m64 -- only with -m32. Other than that, I agree that this is a bug. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed