--- Comment #13 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 15:24 ---
Yes, I only happened to leave before the commit message arrived.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33626
--- Comment #12 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 15:10
---
Fixed, isn't it?
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 07:34 ---
Subject: Bug 33626
Author: tobi
Date: Thu Oct 4 07:34:38 2007
New Revision: 129002
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129002
Log:
PR fortran/33626
fortran/
* resolve.c (resolve_operator): Always c
--- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 22:05
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created an attachment (id=14292)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14292&action=view) [edit]
> Putative patch redux
That patch regtests fines on x86_64-linux with typ
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 17:09
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I checked all tests individually, and both the tests related to
> tiny(0.0_8) fail.
That means Apple's printf() failures to read and write denormals are not
powerpc-specific. I've xfai
--- Comment #8 from Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
2007-10-03 17:06 ---
Subject: Re: Parentheses get wrong kind during matching
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 16:52
> ---
> (In
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 16:52
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> failures of default_format_1.f90 (which I'm seeing as well)
You're seeing failures of default_format_1.f90 on i686-darwin (IIRC, that's
what you've got these days)? That's not supposed
--- Comment #6 from Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
2007-10-03 16:46 ---
Subject: Re: Parentheses get wrong kind during matching
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 16:40
> ---
> (In
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 16:40
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> OTOH I'm seeing a testsuite failure with derived_comp_array_ref_5.f90
> for which I have no explanation at the moment, I'll have to doublecheck
> if it disappears without my patch.
Hu
--- Comment #4 from Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
2007-10-03 16:36 ---
Subject: Re: Parentheses get wrong kind during matching
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 16:26
> ---
> (In
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 16:26
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created an attachment (id=14291)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14291&action=view) [edit]
> Putative patch
I thought about that, because it seems right, but the the
--- Comment #2 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 16:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=14292)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14292&action=view)
Putative patch redux
Coming to think of it, the charlen thing can probably also be moved to the
first switch and d
--- Comment #1 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 16:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=14291)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14291&action=view)
Putative patch
This patch fixes the testcase.
FX, I take it that you have a ready-built compiler with type-checki
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last recon
15 matches
Mail list logo