--- Comment #16 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-03 10:44
---
The Fortran part has its PR, I saw a PR for some C problem also, so I'm closing
this. If other you experience other powerpc regressions, please open new PRs.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #15 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-31 15:52 ---
> > Regarding the last quote I am led to believe that Mr. Pinski is taking undue
> > credit. PR30758 (marked as a duplicate) is the first addressing the
> > re-appearance of mayalias. there are another 5 PR, all appea
--- Comment #14 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-31 14:52 ---
>
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/nint_2.f90 -O0 execution test
>
This one is annoying, I think I had it fixed (I saw it on numerous targets, and
fixed it on most... I believed it was fixed on all targets). If you are willi
--- Comment #13 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 11:10
---
Allow me to step in... michelin60, what about discussing constructively? Here
are the comments I can make one the failures and your remarks. Please answer to
them, or ask further questions if something isn't clea
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 07:59
---
Subject: Re: GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase
On 31 Aug 2007 04:33:12 -, michelin60 at gmail dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Regarding the last quote I am led to believe that Mr. Pinski is t
On 31 Aug 2007 04:33:12 -, michelin60 at gmail dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Regarding the last quote I am led to believe that Mr. Pinski is taking undue
> credit. PR30758 (marked as a duplicate) is the first addressing the
> re-appearance of mayalias. there are another 5 PR, all appear
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 05:29 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Now to the more confusing issue of backporting. I managed to find the
> following:
>
(Stuff from Mark removed)
You're quoting email out of context.
>
> Mr Kargl explains what happened f
--- Comment #10 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-31 04:33 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Subject: Re: GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase
>
> > Second I mentioned Mark Mitchell because he, as relesae manager, put a stop
> > to backporting definitely aggravating produc
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 02:43 ---
> Second I mentioned Mark Mitchell because he, as relesae manager, put a stop
> to backporting definitely aggravating productive use of GCC.
I'm disinterested in the rest of this PR, but I will comment on the above.
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 02:39
---
As Andrew stated, most of these testsuite failures were due to a regression
caused by one of my patches. I do monitor bugzilla submissions during the day.
However, I do this work in the evenings as a volunteer.
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 01:51 ---
Subject: Re: GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase
On 31 Aug 2007 01:43:51 -, michelin60 at gmail dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Second I mentioned Mark Mitchell because he, as relesae manager, put
On 31 Aug 2007 01:43:51 -, michelin60 at gmail dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Second I mentioned Mark Mitchell because he, as relesae manager, put a stop to
> backporting
> definitely aggravating productive use of GCC.
This is the trunk we are talking about, I am seriously thinking you
--- Comment #6 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-31 01:43 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> First off don't CC anyone unless there is a real reason to like you know they
> caused the issue. Second most of the rest of the failures are PR 33225
> anyways.
>
First of all I CC'd Dr. Ed
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 01:15 ---
First off don't CC anyone unless there is a real reason to like you know they
caused the issue. Second most of the rest of the failures are PR 33225
anyways.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #4 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-31 00:47 ---
(> Subject: Re: GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase
>
> > /var/tmp/43/gcc-4.3.0/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-abi/abi.exp.
> > ERROR: could not compile testsuite_abi.cc
>
> This was fixed by:
> 2007-08-30
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-30 18:35 ---
Subject: Re: GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase
> /var/tmp/43/gcc-4.3.0/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-abi/abi.exp.
> ERROR: could not compile testsuite_abi.cc
This was fixed by:
2007-08-30 Jakub Jelinek <
> /var/tmp/43/gcc-4.3.0/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-abi/abi.exp.
> ERROR: could not compile testsuite_abi.cc
This was fixed by:
2007-08-30 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR target/33168
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_elf_in_small_data_p): Return
true if any of
--- Comment #2 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-30 18:24 ---
Subject: Re: GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase
Log in before submitting the attachment
On 30 Aug 2007 18:23:23 -, michelin60 at gmail dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from
--- Comment #1 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-30 18:23 ---
Did not work as attachment with the following message:
GCC Bugzilla has suffered an internal error. Please save this page and send it
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with details of what you were doing at the time this
message ap
19 matches
Mail list logo
