--- Comment #6 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-12 11:27 ---
Subject: Bug 33221
Author: domob
Date: Sat Jul 12 11:26:50 2008
New Revision: 137737
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137737
Log:
2008-07-12 Daniel Kraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* resolve.
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-20 22:05
---
Fixed.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSI
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-20 22:03
---
Subject: Bug 33221
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Thu Sep 20 22:03:22 2007
New Revision: 128633
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128633
Log:
PR fortran/33221
* gfortran.h (symbol_a
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-18 11:31
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> One thing that comes to mind is the following patch. It allows derived types
> with zero components to be accepted, but I fear that it might make us accept
> invalid code with empty deri
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-18 08:26
---
This is because, in gfc_use_derived (symbol.c), when checking whether a derived
type is in the current unit or a parent unit, we check (sym->components !=
NULL) and if it's true, we take it to mean that the derive
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last recon
