[Bug fortran/33152] Initialization/declaration problems in block data

2007-11-25 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-25 23:51 --- Fixed on trunk. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/33152] Initialization/declaration problems in block data

2007-11-25 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-25 22:15 --- Subject: Bug 33152 Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Nov 25 22:14:57 2007 New Revision: 130416 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130416 Log: 2007-11-25 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug fortran/33152] Initialization/declaration problems in block data

2007-11-25 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-25 22:12 --- Subject: Bug 33152 Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Nov 25 22:12:19 2007 New Revision: 130415 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130415 Log: 2007-11-25 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug fortran/33152] Initialization/declaration problems in block data

2007-11-25 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-25 17:22 --- oops, I had the wrong PR number in the ChangeLog. Should have been for PR34175. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33152

[Bug fortran/33152] Initialization/declaration problems in block data

2007-11-25 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-25 15:58 --- Subject: Bug 33152 Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Nov 25 15:57:55 2007 New Revision: 130409 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130409 Log: 2007-11-25 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug fortran/33152] Initialization/declaration problems in block data

2007-11-24 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-25 03:28 --- I have a patch on its way. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/33152] Initialization/declaration problems in block data

2007-10-22 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #3 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-10-22 07:03 --- Just to be sure, it is a rejects-valid as well. BLOCK DATA character(len=3) :: emname(2)=(/'bar','baz'/) common/nmstr/emname END BLOCK DATA END -- jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed: What|Removed

[Bug fortran/33152] Initialization/declaration problems in block data

2007-10-21 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-21 07:30 --- Given Steve's comment, this clearly should be confirmed! Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/33152] Initialization/declaration problems in block data

2007-08-22 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-23 00:09 --- It's much worse than you've indicated. :( gfortran compiles subroutine y data emname/'bar'/ character(len=3) :: emname end subroutine y which violates "A variable that appears in a DATA statement and has no