https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32957
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8)
> > So is this fixed now?
>
> I have spotted some new tests requiring c_int:
>
> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_usage_24.f90 2018-02-18
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32957
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> So is this fixed now?
I have spotted some new tests requiring c_int:
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_usage_24.f90 2018-02-18
00:40:36.0 +0100
+++ ../p_work/gcc/testsuite/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32957
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to dominiq from comment #6)
> Author: dominiq
> Date: Mon Feb 26 09:55:39 2018
> New Revision: 257985
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257985&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> 2018-02-26 Dominiqu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32957
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Mon Feb 26 09:55:39 2018
New Revision: 257985
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257985&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-26 Dominique d'Humieres
PR fortran/32957
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32957
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32957
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-12-27
11:14:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 26187
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26187
patch to fix some failures with -fdefault-integer-8
I have this patch in my tree for a quite
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-12-06 10:52 ---
If I apply the following patch:
--- c_loc_tests_2.f03 2009-11-25 18:17:45.0 +0100
+++ c_loc_tests_2_db_1.f03 2009-12-06 11:43:31.0 +0100
@@ -44,13 +44,13 @@ contains
end subroutine test0
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Ke
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-08-02 17:08 ---
Subject: Re: C/Fortran interoperability and
-fdefault-integer-8
> A check of this option can be inserted at various locations during
> the parsing.
Certainly, but this will give a very interesting exercise to buil
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-01 15:04 ---
At this point, the easiest fix is probably going to be to document
that -fdefault-integer-8 should not be used with bind(c) code. A
check of this option can be inserted at various locations during the
parsing.
--
10 matches
Mail list logo
