--- Comment #11 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 13:25
---
Fixed.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASS
--- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 13:21
---
Subject: Bug 32933
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Fri Aug 10 13:20:46 2007
New Revision: 127334
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127334
Log:
PR fortran/32933
* trans-decl.c (gfc_b
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 10:31
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> But there is, internally with __builtin_isnan.
And that's where I got it wrong. In the Fortran front-end, boolean_type_node is
an integer of the default logical kind, while I thought it
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-08 17:27
---
See PR32943 for other examples of testcases that exhibit the same ICE. When
this one is fixed, we should make sure all these have gone.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32933
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-08 17:26
---
*** Bug 32943 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-08 15:24
---
I reduced bounds_check_5.f90 to the following:
$ cat o2.f90
INTEGER, POINTER :: x(:)
logical :: l
l = associated(x,x)
end
$ gfortran -fdefault-integer-8 -m32 o2.f90
o2.f90: In function MAIN__:
o2.f90:3: i
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-06 17:35 ---
*** Bug 33006 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-02 20:38 ---
Same place to ICE for bounds_check_5.f90.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32933
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-31 21:20 ---
The testcase is illegal code because a is never assigned a value.
I also do not see where __builtin_isnan is supposely coming into
play here?
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-31 20:58 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> But there's no integer *at all* in the testcase! How come?
But there is, internally with __builtin_isnan.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32933
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-31 20:54
---
(In reply to comment #0)
> $ gfortran -fdefault-integer-8 nan_6.f90
But there's no integer *at all* in the testcase! How come?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32933
11 matches
Mail list logo
