[Bug fortran/32842] User operator / allocateable array: Wrong code

2007-07-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 19:18 --- Fixed on trunk Thanks Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/32842] User operator / allocateable array: Wrong code

2007-07-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 19:16 --- Subject: Bug 32842 Author: pault Date: Tue Jul 24 19:16:36 2007 New Revision: 126886 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126886 Log: 2007-07-24 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/31

[Bug fortran/32842] User operator / allocateable array: Wrong code

2007-07-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 19:15 --- Subject: Bug 32842 Author: pault Date: Tue Jul 24 19:15:27 2007 New Revision: 126885 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126885 Log: 2007-07-24 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/31

[Bug fortran/32842] User operator / allocateable array: Wrong code

2007-07-24 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 11:20 --- Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg01709.html See also PR 31205. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32842

[Bug fortran/32842] User operator / allocateable array: Wrong code

2007-07-23 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-23 09:06 --- This is indeed fixed by my patch for PR31205. I had the breakthrough in understanding why this broke cp2K at about 3 o'clock this morning *sigh* The fix turned out to be very easy but understanding what was broken was

[Bug fortran/32842] User operator / allocateable array: Wrong code

2007-07-22 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-22 19:34 --- s/Wong/Wrong/ As the old joke says abot the Chinese fotball team, "two wings and a Wong..." This appears to be fixed by my patch for pr32105; which, however, breaks cp2k. I am onto this but have spent the entirity o