[Bug fortran/32665] allocatable array on lhs deleted while still in use on rhs

2007-07-17 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 17:49 --- Fixed on trunk. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Statu

[Bug fortran/32665] allocatable array on lhs deleted while still in use on rhs

2007-07-17 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 17:23 --- Subject: Bug 32665 Author: pault Date: Tue Jul 17 17:22:44 2007 New Revision: 126703 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126703 Log: 2007-07-17 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/32665] allocatable array on lhs deleted while still in use on rhs

2007-07-16 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 12:01 --- I have just posted a fix for this PR. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/32665] allocatable array on lhs deleted while still in use on rhs

2007-07-16 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-07-16 09:45 --- Subject: Bug number PR32665 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg01417.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug fortran/32665] allocatable array on lhs deleted while still in use on rhs

2007-07-13 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-13 13:48 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Paul, please have a look at PR31320 as well. > The issue described there is at least very close to your observation. (In reply to comment #3) > Paul, please have a look at PR31320 as well.

[Bug fortran/32665] allocatable array on lhs deleted while still in use on rhs

2007-07-13 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-13 09:58 --- Paul, please have a look at PR31320 as well. The issue described there is at least very close to your observation. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32665

[Bug fortran/32665] allocatable array on lhs deleted while still in use on rhs

2007-07-13 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-13 09:50 --- This is a two-in-oner; as well as the deallocation, this is broken: $ cat pr32665.f90 TYPE :: x INTEGER, ALLOCATABLE :: a(:) END TYPE TYPE(x) :: a, b call foo b = x((/ (a%a), 4 /)) print *, "foo gives

[Bug fortran/32665] allocatable array on lhs deleted while still in use on rhs

2007-07-09 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-09 22:42 --- Oh dear - that's right. I feel a temporary coming on! Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added