[Bug fortran/32616] "Too short actual argument" for array element storage sequence

2008-01-18 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-18 23:49 --- FIXED on the trunk (4.3.0). -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/32616] "Too short actual argument" for array element storage sequence

2008-01-18 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-18 23:46 --- Subject: Bug 32616 Author: burnus Date: Fri Jan 18 23:46:04 2008 New Revision: 131643 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131643 Log: 2008-01-18 Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fort

[Bug fortran/32616] "Too short actual argument" for array element storage sequence

2008-01-16 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 21:54 --- Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-01/msg00208.html -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/32616] "Too short actual argument" for array element storage sequence

2007-08-15 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last recon

[Bug fortran/32616] "Too short actual argument" for array element storage sequence

2007-07-04 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-04 18:15 --- > A more general case as described in PR30939? Well, my example in PR30939 is actually fixed by PR30940, however, as NAG f95 proofs, one can test this at run time. I thus changed the purpose of that bug. This PR is

[Bug fortran/32616] "Too short actual argument" for array element storage sequence

2007-07-03 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-03 21:44 --- A more general case as described in PR30939? -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added