https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:85b0a6e853aeda30acc1990c8bf13951c7e4da7d
commit r15-7500-g85b0a6e853aeda30acc1990c8bf13951c7e4da7d
Author: Rainer Orth
Date: Thu F
--- Comment #15 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-07-03 13:43 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Fixed with rev 137386. Btw I have also tried compiling the whole CP2K, which
> seems to work fine.
>
I've also checked that gfortran now appears to compile correctly the procedure
pointer pa
--- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 20:19 ---
Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 20:19 ---
Fixed with rev 137386. Btw I have also tried compiling the whole CP2K, which
seems to work fine.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 19:54 ---
Subject: Bug 32580
Author: janus
Date: Wed Jul 2 19:53:37 2008
New Revision: 137386
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137386
Log:
2008-07-02 Janus Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tobias B
--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-02 15:32 ---
Another link dump:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/ff7ae6c7a7860bca/60213205751117d4
Some of the test cases should be checked when the proc pointer patch is ready
to ensure all a
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-29 11:29 ---
Move comment from PR 36325, see also
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/bb371413b5cbe3d7
The following is regarded as valid and did not work with one of the last
versions of proc p
--- Comment #9 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-05-25 12:13 ---
> It's not complete yet, and some details need to be fixed, but the basic
> functionality is there. I hope it can be committed to trunk quite soon.
that would be great... I really hope this will be enough to enable the
--- Comment #8 from jaydub66 at gmail dot com 2008-05-24 17:52 ---
I have a patch which can handle this test case, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-05/msg00296.html
It's not complete yet, and some details need to be fixed, but the basic
functionality is there. I hope it can be com
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-16 11:26 ---
> Since adding c_f_procpointer might change the fortran runtime library, will
> this addition be OK for 4.4 ?
Additions of functions is no problem; also modifying functions
arguments/functionality is no problem. Howev
--- Comment #6 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-10-16 08:30 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > SoC is over, I assume this has been put on ice ?
>
> Yes, there was unfortunately no patch before GCC entered stage 3 (12
> September)
> and in stage 3 merging ne
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-16 06:46 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> SoC is over, I assume this has been put on ice ?
Yes, there was unfortunately no patch before GCC entered stage 3 (12 September)
and in stage 3 merging new features is allowed. (Besides, th
--- Comment #4 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-10-16 04:32 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Resolution of this bug requires the PROCEDURE POINTER feature
> from Fortran 2003. Janus Weil, a Google SoC participant, is
> working on this feature.
>
SoC is over, I assume this has been
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-04 18:29 ---
Clean up from my Bind(C) notes: The following should give an error such as:
Error: 'fptr' argument of 'c_f_procpointer' intrinsic at (1) must be a
PROCEDURE POINTER
use iso_c_binding
type(c_funptr) :: cfunptr
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-02 14:57 ---
Resolution of this bug requires the PROCEDURE POINTER feature
from Fortran 2003. Janus Weil, a Google SoC participant, is
working on this feature.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Rem
--- Comment #1 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-07-02 07:37 ---
Fixing this bug would likely allow to compile/link the full CP2K (including the
bit that depends on the ISO_C_BINDING)
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
16 matches
Mail list logo
