--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-14 03:02
---
Fixed on trunk.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
S
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 19:01
---
Subject: Bug 32489
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jan 9 19:01:41 2010
New Revision: 155773
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155773
Log:
2010-01-09 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/32489
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 18:31
---
Subject: Bug 32489
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jan 9 18:31:00 2010
New Revision: 155772
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155772
Log:
2010-01-09 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/32489
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 17:47
---
Subject: Bug 32489
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jan 9 17:47:04 2010
New Revision: 155769
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155769
Log:
2010-01-09 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/20923
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-10 20:11
---
Tobias, thanks for posting the link to the patch. I want to make sure we can
build cp2k with this and if anyone has any other large apps, I want to make
sure we don;t regress. Maybe weather modeling and such. :)
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-10 08:23 ---
Cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-12/msg00062.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32489
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-08 20:32
---
This really is not a duplicate of PR20923. In fact the gfortran frontend makes
it through the fft257.f90 test case in a few seconds. The memory hogging and
cycling is happening in middle-end.
With a simple vari
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-12 09:43 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Dominique,
Indeed - I found all those regressions when I got up this morning. However,
the patch indicates which way to go. The compiler is repeatedly trying to
expand an array that it cann
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-01-12 09:19 ---
I forgot to say that the patch in #5 fixed this PR, but you can add to the list
of regressions:
[ibook-dhum] f90/bug% gfc
/opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/char_result_6.f90
/opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsu
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-01-11 23:21 ---
With the patch there is a regression for the following tests:
[ibook-dhum] f90/bug% gfc
/opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_initializer_1.f90
/opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_initia
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-11 22:01 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Will 2.5s do you on amd64/Cygwin_nt?
Index: gcc/fortran/array.c
===
*** gcc/fortran/array.c (revision 131469)
--- gcc/fortran/ar
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-11 19:12 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Breaking up the expression for h1, thusly:
hh = (/(exp(-2*pi*(0,1)*mod(k*L,N)/N)*h2(L),L=0,N-1)/)
h1 = (/(sum(hh),k=0,N-1)/)
cures the problem.
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-25 08:02 ---
> Seen this before
> I think this is the same bug as something I filed.
I found it (PR31301) after looking for closed bugs; it was marked as duplicate
of
PR31301.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-25 06:58 ---
h1 =
(/(sum((/(exp(-2*pi*(0,1)*mod(k*L,N)/N)*h2(L),L=0,N-1)/)),k=0,N-1)/)
Seen this before
I think this is the same bug as something I filed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32489
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-25 06:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=13781)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13781&action=view)
fft257.f90 test case
>From http://home.comcast.net/~kmbtib/
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
15 matches
Mail list logo
