[Bug fortran/32380] misaligned stores don't get vectorized

2012-06-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32380 --- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-06 12:53:35 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 6 12:53:30 2012 New Revision: 188266 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188266 Log: 2012-06-06 Richard Guenther PR testsu

[Bug fortran/32380] misaligned stores don't get vectorized

2012-02-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32380 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig 2012-02-20 17:16:38 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Feb 20 17:16:33 2012 New Revision: 184398 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184398 Log: 2012-02-13 Thomas Koenig PR testsuite/52

[Bug fortran/32380] misaligned stores don't get vectorized

2012-02-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32380 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-09 12:13:25 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Feb 9 12:13:18 2012 New Revision: 184043 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184043 Log: PR fortran/32380 * gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380

[Bug fortran/32380] misaligned stores don't get vectorized

2012-02-08 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32380 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/32380] misaligned stores don't get vectorized

2012-02-08 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32380 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig 2012-02-08 19:53:59 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Wed Feb 8 19:53:56 2012 New Revision: 184017 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184017 Log: 2012-02-08 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/3

[Bug fortran/32380] misaligned stores don't get vectorized

2012-02-05 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32380 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/32380] misaligned stores don't get vectorized

2007-07-15 Thread dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-15 19:02 --- (In reply to comment #4) > The arrays in this example all have compatible alignment. This is one of the > advantages many compilers see in the use of the "old-fashioned" block COMMON. > In the usual case lft==1 all ar

[Bug fortran/32380] misaligned stores don't get vectorized

2007-07-15 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Comment #4 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-07-15 18:43 --- The arrays in this example all have compatible alignment. This is one of the advantages many compilers see in the use of the "old-fashioned" block COMMON. In the usual case lft==1 all arrays in COMMON are aligned, with

[Bug fortran/32380] misaligned stores don't get vectorized

2007-07-15 Thread dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-15 18:31 --- > With loop distribution we could vectorize these loops using peeling to handle > misaligned stores (multiple stores make peeling for alignment insufficient > here). wonder what the loop-distribution pass in the graph

[Bug fortran/32380] misaligned stores don't get vectorized

2007-07-11 Thread irar at il dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #2 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2007-07-11 14:50 --- I don't get any dependence test failures on current mainline. I think they were solved by Zdenek's rewrite of data-refs' analysis, since I can still see those failures on autovect-branch (with old data-refs' analysis):