--- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-27 14:28
---
Fixed on mainline.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-27 14:26
---
Subject: Bug 32035
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Fri Jul 27 14:26:43 2007
New Revision: 126978
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126978
Log:
PR fortran/32035
* trans-stmt.c (gfc_tr
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-11 21:54
---
I think it was decided that until 4.3 is released, we don't care about
libgfortran ABI stability
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg00927.html)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32035
--- Comment #7 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-11 21:42 ---
The proposed patch (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg01098.html)
breaks library compatibility. Is this intentional?
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-23 03:18 ---
Ok, what is going on here has to deal with how select/case works for strings.
What the front-end produces confuses the crazy out of the middle-end and the
middle-end does not know where the jumps can go so it assum
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-22 20:14 ---
> It might have to do with stop not being marked as noreturn.
How to mark as noreturn? I mean differently from what is alreay done in
trans-decl.c:
gfor_fndecl_stop_numeric =
gfc_build_library_function_decl (ge
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-22 18:32 ---
It might have to do with stop not being marked as noreturn.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32035
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-22 18:29 ---
> > why has the variable no name for the middle end;
> that is a front issue for now
Hmm, why did this trick to get rid of PRs not work? ;-)
Reduced test case:
subroutine Test
implicit none
intege
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-22 16:31 ---
> why has the variable no name for the middle end;
that is a front issue for now, it might not be complaining about Integer_1 but
a different variable.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
10 matches
Mail list logo
