[Bug fortran/31971] Simple Fortran code fails with ICE

2007-05-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-22 19:50 --- Not a GCC/Gfortran bug so closing as works for me. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/31971] Simple Fortran code fails with ICE

2007-05-22 Thread magnus_os at yahoo dot se
--- Comment #10 from magnus_os at yahoo dot se 2007-05-22 19:47 --- Installing MPFR 2.2.1-p5 helped. gfortran doesn't fail anymore. Thanks -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31971

[Bug fortran/31971] Simple Fortran code fails with ICE

2007-05-22 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-22 17:33 --- (In reply to comment #8) > I use the GMP/MPFR libraries from Fedora 6. No other installation of MPFR has > been done. Hum, that's more than probably it: FC6 has a GMP which contained an older version of MPFR. The

[Bug fortran/31971] Simple Fortran code fails with ICE

2007-05-22 Thread magnus_os at yahoo dot se
--- Comment #8 from magnus_os at yahoo dot se 2007-05-22 17:22 --- I downloaded the binaries, and no problems with those. gfortran -v Using built-in specs. Target: i386-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: /home/fxcoudert/gfortran_nightbuild/trunk/configure --prefix=/home/fxcoudert/gfortran_ni

[Bug fortran/31971] Simple Fortran code fails with ICE

2007-05-22 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-22 16:46 --- (In reply to comment #6) > I've reproduced the problem on the official 2007-05-18 snapshot. Can you reproduce it with the binaries available from the following link? http://quatramaran.ens.fr/~coudert/gfortran/gf

[Bug fortran/31971] Simple Fortran code fails with ICE

2007-05-22 Thread magnus_os at yahoo dot se
--- Comment #6 from magnus_os at yahoo dot se 2007-05-22 16:38 --- I've reproduced the problem on the official 2007-05-18 snapshot. This backtrace is from that: Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. 0x086b7d19 in mpfr_ceil_double () (gdb) where #0 0x086b7d19 in mpfr_cei

[Bug fortran/31971] Simple Fortran code fails with ICE

2007-05-22 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-22 12:40 --- (In reply to comment #3) > I have Fedora 6 on x86-64. Works OK here. However, we have a leak. Well, the leak is also triggered by the simple following two lines: SUBROUTINE XYZ END ==10212== 1,012

[Bug fortran/31971] Simple Fortran code fails with ICE

2007-05-22 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-22 12:36 --- (In reply to comment #2) > The OS is Fedora 6. No ICE for me on i686 with Fedora Core 6. I suspect this will be hard to reproduce. Could you provide us with a backtrace, by doing the following: 1. run gfortran

[Bug fortran/31971] Simple Fortran code fails with ICE

2007-05-17 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-18 07:05 --- I have Fedora 6 on x86-64. Works OK here. However, we have a leak. From valgrind: ==19184== 9,288 (1,264 direct, 8,024 indirect) bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 4 of 9 ==19184==at 0x4A

[Bug fortran/31971] Simple Fortran code fails with ICE

2007-05-17 Thread magnus_os at yahoo dot se
--- Comment #2 from magnus_os at yahoo dot se 2007-05-18 05:41 --- The OS is Fedora 6. The compiler was generated from source after doing a "svn update". I made sure that no previous object code was present before rebuilding. The CPU is a 32-bit AMD 3000. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi

[Bug fortran/31971] Simple Fortran code fails with ICE

2007-05-17 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-17 16:05 --- Works for me. What OS are you using and where did you get the version of gfortran? An illegal instruction error normally means you are using a version of gfortran on the wrong architecture (ie., i686 on amd64). --