[Bug fortran/31711] was "rhs array is changed while assiging to same lhs array"

2015-10-18 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31711 --- Comment #19 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #18) > > comment #10 from Roger-Sayle is being kept "live" by this PR. Whilst > > I am interested, I have to give priority to other PRs to make best use > > of m

[Bug fortran/31711] was "rhs array is changed while assiging to same lhs array"

2015-10-18 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31711 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/31711] was "rhs array is changed while assiging to same lhs array"

2007-08-26 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-26 11:24 --- Changing severity to enhancement. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/31711] was "rhs array is changed while assiging to same lhs array"

2007-08-20 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-20 07:16 --- comment #10 from Roger-Sayle is being kept "live" by this PR. Whilst I am interested, I have to give priority to other PRs to make best use of my limited time. I may yet come back to it Paul -- pault at gcc