--- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-17 22:22 ---
Subject: Bug 31538
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Apr 17 22:22:02 2010
New Revision: 158476
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158476
Log:
2010-04-17 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/31538
* gfortran
--- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-17 22:12 ---
Fixed on 4.5 branch and trunk.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-17 21:06 ---
Subject: Bug 31538
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Apr 17 21:05:53 2010
New Revision: 158474
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158474
Log:
2010-04-17 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/31538
* gfortran
--- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-16 18:25 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> The run time error for
>
> i = 0
> a(i:1) = b(0:4)
>
> is
>
> At line 9 of file pr31538_db_2.f90
> Fortran runtime error: Array bound mismatch, size mismatch for dimension 1 of
> array 'a
--- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-04-16 17:38 ---
The run time error for
i = 0
a(i:1) = b(0:4)
is
At line 9 of file pr31538_db_2.f90
Fortran runtime error: Array bound mismatch, size mismatch for dimension 1 of
array 'a' (2/5)
for
i = 0
a(i:1) = f(b)
it is
At
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-16 17:24 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Assuming 'i = -4' is missing in the programming
Well, almost any number would do, but "i = -4" is fine.
> why is the runtime bounds check not a sufficient error message?
Because:
Fortr
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-16 16:14 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Newly created test case. Expected:
> > * Extend (size) should be printed for "a = f()", as NAG f95 does
> >
> > (I'm not sure that "different shape" is correct f
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-16 16:05 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Newly created test case. Expected:
> * Extend (size) should be printed for "a = f()", as NAG f95 does
>
> (I'm not sure that "different shape" is correct for the current a=b message;
> addit
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 09:43 ---
Newly created test case. Expected:
* Extend (size) should be printed for "a = f()", as NAG f95 does
(I'm not sure that "different shape" is correct for the current a=b message;
additionally, the A should not be capit
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-11 22:52 ---
I fixed the result_in_spec_1.f90 problem in trunk.
The diagnostic should remain as a problem, however. I have hijacked this PR
for it:)
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
10 matches
Mail list logo
